Immigrants to the UK since 2000 have made a “substantial” contribution to public finances, a report says.
The study by University College London said recent immigrants were less likely to claim benefits and live in social housing than people born in Britain.
The authors said rather than being a “drain”, their contribution had been “remarkably strong”.
The government said it was right to have strict rules in place to help protect the benefits system.
Immigrants who arrived after 1999 were 45% less likely to receive state benefits or tax credits than UK natives in the period 2000-2011, according to the report by Prof Christian Dustmann and Dr Tommaso Frattini from UCL’s Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration.
They were also 3% less likely to live in social housing.
“These differences are partly explainable by immigrants’ more favourable age-gender composition. However, even when compared to natives with the same age, gender composition, and education, recent immigrants are still 21% less likely than natives to receive benefits,” the authors say.
Those from the European Economic Area (EEA – the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) had made a particularly positive contribution in the decade up to 2011, contributing 34% more in taxes than they received in benefits.
Immigrants from outside the EEA contributed 2% more in taxes than they received in the same period, the report showed.
Over the same period, British people paid 11% less in tax than they received.
Despite the positive figures in the decade since the millennium, the study found that between 1995 and 2011, immigrants from non-EEA countries claimed more in benefits than they paid in taxes, mainly because they tended to have more children than native Britons.
Continue reading the main story
We welcome those that want to come here to contribute to the economy, but it’s absolutely right that we have strict rules in place to protect the integrity of the British benefits system to ensure it’s not abused”
The report also showed that in 2011, 32% of recent EEA immigrants and 43% of non-EEA immigrants had university degrees, compared with 21% of the British adult population.
The research used data from the British Labour Force Survey and government reports. Prof Dustmann said it had shown that “in contrast with most other European countries, the UK attracts highly educated and skilled immigrants from within the EEA as well as from outside”.
He added: “Our study also suggests that over the last decade or so, the UK has benefited fiscally from immigrants from EEA countries, who have put in considerably more in taxes and contributions than they received in benefits and transfers.
“Given this evidence, claims about “benefit tourism” by EEA immigrants seem to be disconnected from reality.”
A spokesman for the government said: “We welcome those that want to come here to contribute to the economy, but it’s absolutely right that we have strict rules in place to protect the integrity of the British benefits system to ensure it’s not abused.”
Meanwhile, a separate UCL study released on Tuesday warns that the government’s target to cut net migration to the UK to the tens of thousands is “neither a useful tool nor a measure of policy effectiveness”.
That report argues that actions to cut work-related, student and family migration have damaged the UK’s reputation as a good place to work and study.
The 2011 census showed that 13% of the population of England and Wales was born outside the UK.